Tuesday, May 22, 2007
LearnLink Upgrade is finally complete!
While the new version offers many of the same features as the older one, v8.3 totes a new interface (MS Outlook users may experiences some déjà vu!) and several new tools and features.
The LearnLink website also has a new face. We're still working on updating the entire site, but we have the main pages sporting the new McMaster website look and feel.
For more details about the upgrade and the new system, please visit: http://www.learnlink.mcmaster.ca
- Katrina Espanol-Miller
Friday, May 11, 2007
Process update
WebCT summer course requests are still coming in and our staff have started to collate and compare the survey data as well as the RFI vendor data in preparation for a ranking of the RFI submissions according to the expressed needs of our LMS community. I have also started working on an RFP framework for the next stage of the selection process and have been meeting with Deans and dept. chairs in order to update them and get them involved in the process.
I would also like to introduce the newest member of the committee. He is an undergraduate student by the name of Po Ko. Po is a second year Social Sciences student pursing a combined honours in Political Science and Communications Studies. Welcome Po! I envision our next committee meeting to be in late June but that is flexible and contingent on our workload and ability to complete the data analysis and research necessary for you to make an informed decision regarding which products should continue in the process.
- Bart Strong
Lucky streak!
- Laila Bastedo
Monday, May 7, 2007
Student surveys are now closed
- Wayne Cai
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Spending time at the drop-in sessions was worth it
- Katrina Espanol-Miller
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Process framework presentations
- Laila Bastedo
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Faculty Information Session
- Bart Strong
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
Agenda for Evaluation Committee
Bart Strong
Monday, February 12, 2007
Campus Wide Survey Progress
From the beginning this selection and evaluation process was going to be needs driven: by faculty, support staff, students. It is cruicial to involve the user community - how could we choose a product that is used in every Faculty across campus without consulting the very people that use it? On top of that, we have technical and administrative challenges in that a new LMS must work with the University's infrastructure, procedures and policies. In addition to that is the challenge of finding an LMS that not only has the flexibility to cater to different learning styles, but one that can then be managed efficiently. We don't want to spend all of our time running an LMS and no time interacting with those who use the sytem.
We have now started the process of creating surveys for faculty, staff, students, administrators and technical staff. Each of the surveys draws on the extensive feature list in the RFI. Wayne is busy investigating the use of an open source software package so that we can deliver the surveys online. Development may be a bit slow since we are going to be working away at the LMS evaluation process on top of our regular responsibilities. Despite that, we have a very talented group - I think we'll manage nicely.
Laila BastedoFriday, February 9, 2007
Technical Surveys
This has been a long process. Sometimes I think that I will go crazy if anyone comes back with more changes to the surveys. However, each iteration does produce a better quality product, so fueling my patience.
The technical survey is almost ready for distribution. The survey for faculty, staff and students is still in progress.
Wayne CaiTuesday, January 2, 2007
WebCT Usage Continues to Climb
It seems that we haven't reached our plateau of WebCT course requests yet. Usage continues to grow for the system. The queue of course requests and other support requests has about a 2 week turnaround. Luckily we've hired a student who has turned out to be an invaluable help. As course usage continues to grow (we expect about 1000 for this academic year), the related support issues, training needs, and instructional design consultation grows.
I'm really looking forward to this LMS selection process. I think it is a good opportunity for us to re-evaluate our support structure, technical and administrative processes. Maybe there is opportunity in the new LMS to further automate many of the administrative tasks that are required so that we can spend more time on instructional design and training that the faculty want.
Colin Czerneda